Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Plumbers & Pipefitters Local 102 v. Consolidated Nuclear Security, LLC
as 3:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
Plumbers & Pipefitters Local 102
Defendant:
Consolidated Nuclear Security, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00337
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Monden v. Consolidated Nuclear Security LLC
as 2:2022cv00004
Plaintiff:
Mr. Stephen Cobey Monden and Stephen Cobey Monden
Defendant:
Consolidated Nuclear Security LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00205
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Myers et al v. Consolidated Nuclear Security, LLC (TV1)
as 3:2020cv00142
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS MESSERLI, JAMES MYERS and James Young
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED NUCLEAR SECURITY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Victoria Bowers v. U.S. Department of Energy, et al
as 20-3100
Respondent:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY and CONSOLIDATED NUCLEAR SECURITY, LLC
Petitioner:
VICTORIA S. BOWERS
Board of Trustees of the Southern Electrical Retirement Fund v. Consolidated Nuclear Security, LLC
as 3:2019cv00897
Defendant:
Consolidated Nuclear Security, LLC
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the Southern Electrical Retirement Fund
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00307
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00106
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
