Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Diaz v. Neal et al
as 3:2022cv00874
Plaintiff:
Rolando L Diaz
Defendant:
Ron D Neal, C Frediarelli, G Page and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Contreras et al
as 3:2019cv00264
Defendant:
Jorge Contreras, Jr and Capital One, NA
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00486
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Contreras-Munoz v. Warden
as 3:2018cv00485
Petitioner:
Cesar Contreras-Munoz
Respondent:
Warden
Miscellaneous_party:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CONTRERAS v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2016cv02693
Plaintiff:
AMANDA CONTRERAS
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BICKHAM et al v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
as 1:2015cv00531
Plaintiff:
CALVIN AUSTIN, EUGENE DAVID BENOIT, JR., AARON GRAHAM BICKHAM and others
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hardy v. Schroth et al
as 3:2015cv00057
Plaintiff:
Tracey Arnell Hardy
Defendant:
Sgt Bryan Schroth, Det Andre Whitmyer, Det Greg Harder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Buford v. Schroth et al
as 3:2014cv01684
Plaintiff:
Antyon Lamario Buford
Defendant:
Sgt Brian Schroth, Det Whitmyer, Det Contreras and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANAEME v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2012cv00199
Defendant:
ED, JESICCA, MR ACEVADO and others
Plaintiff:
CHIBUEZE C. ANAEME
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
Allstate Insurance Company v. Contreras et al
as 2:2010cv00181
Plaintiff:
Allstate Insurance Company
Defendant:
Daniel Contreras, Raudel Contreras, Martha Robles-Moya and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
