Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Aepelbacher et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv12030
Plaintiff:
Rory Walsh, Brian Hilderbrand, Marianne Fabozzi and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
Wanda Holden, et al v. Cordis Corporation
as 16-80147
Plaintiff - Respondent:
WANDA HOLDEN, TAMBRA SHIFFLET, LANORA BARRETT and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
CORDIS CORPORATION
Freeman et al v. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as ILS/3:16-cv-00557
Plaintiff:
Brenda Freeman , Cynthia Acker , Mary Acosta and others
Defendant:
Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. , Janssen Research & Development, LLC , Janssen Ortho LLP and others
Coogan v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv05516
Plaintiff:
Mary K. Coogan
Defendant:
BP Exploration & Production, Inc., BP America Production Company and BP PLC
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 2701
Bauman v. Simmons et al
as 3:2011cv03607
Plaintiff:
Bert Bauman
Defendant:
Harold C Simmons, Bobby D O'Brien, James W Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Green et al v. Canidae Corporation et al
as 2:2011mc00207
Plaintiff:
Adrienne Green, Karen Bursk, Eldon Presnell and others
Defendant:
Canidae Corporation and Schell & Kampeter, Inc.
Movant:
Bill Barr & Company, Inc.
Green et al v. Canidae Corporation
as 2:2010mc09017
Defendant:
Canidae Corporation
Plaintiff:
Adrienne Green , Karen Bursk , Eldon Presnell and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Adrienne Green v. Canidae Corporation et al
as 2:2009cv00486
Plaintiff:
Karen Bursk, Leslie Coogan, Rhonda Dunn and others
Defendant:
Canidae Corporation and Schell & Kampeter, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Coogan et al v. Steed et al
as 2:2010cv00682
Plaintiff:
Linda Coogan and Kenneth Morelli
Defendant:
Joan A. Steed , Frank Joe Steed , Highland Development and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
