Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Wolf v. Commonwealth of Kentucky, Department of Corrections et al
as 0:2026cv00096
Plaintiff:
Dimitri S Wolf
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Kentucky, Department of Corrections, Cookie Crews, Scott Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly v. Hutchens et al
as 4:2026cv00402
Plaintiff:
Steven Michael Kelly
Defendant:
Alisha Hutchens, Tim Lane, Denise Burkett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrison v. Crews et al
as 3:2026cv00045
Plaintiff:
James Harrison
Defendant:
Cookie Crews, Jane/John Does, Kentucky Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Jackson v. Crews et al
as 3:2026cv00040
Plaintiff:
Antonio D. Jackson, Sr.
Defendant:
Cookie Crews, Warden David Sexton, Chaplain Charles Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
D6 LLC v. Granny B's Cookies
as 2:2026cv00392
Plaintiff:
D6 LLC
Defendant:
Granny B's Cookies
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Hampton v. Beshear et al
as 1:2026cv00080
Plaintiff:
Quinton Lashawn Hampton
Defendant:
Andy Beshear, Cookie Crews, Melissa Chandler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-1794
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
ONATOLU v. 7 ELEVEN COOKIES
as 1:2026cv04173
Plaintiff:
ADEKUNLE A ONATOLU
Defendant:
7 ELEVEN COOKIES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sims v. Burtrum et al
as 1:2026cv00064
Petitioner:
Dennis Keith Sims
Respondent:
Warden Shannon Burtrum and DOC Commissioner Cookie Crews
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wolf v. Crews et al
as 0:2026cv00060
Plaintiff:
Dimitri S Wolf and Iokepa Kenneth Kipi
Defendant:
Cookie Crews, Scott Jordan, Shawn McKenzie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
