Cases 21 - 30 of 53
Jim Harris v. Corizon LLC, et al
as 20-2489
Defendant / Appellee:
Ernest W. Jackson, Pat Roes, 1-5, Corizon LLC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jim R. Harris
Jim Harris v. Ernest Jackson, et al
as 20-2492
Defendant / Appellee:
Corizon, LLC, Pat Roes, 1-5, R. Eric Bessey, DDS, individually and in his official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jim R. Harris
Burrell v. Corizon LLC et al
as 6:2020cv03129
Defendant:
Kathy Barton, J. Cofield, Dr. Ashokkumar R Chada and others
Plaintiff:
Eugene Preston Burrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Colbert v. Corizon LLC et al
as 6:2020cv03088
Defendant:
Kathy Barton, J. Cofield, Corizon LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Darryl Colbert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beggs et al v. Missouri Department of Corrections, et al
as 2:2019cv04227
Plaintiff:
Terry McIlvoy, Andre Boyd, William Beggs and others
Defendant:
Corizon LLC and Missouri Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ritchie v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2019cv04216
Defendant:
George Lombardi, Pamala Swartz, Thomas Pryor and others
Plaintiff:
John Ritchie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Merritt v. Payne et al
as 4:2019cv03101
Defendant:
Sharmila Suri, Corizon, LLC, Warden Stanley Payne and others
Plaintiff:
Shaun Merritt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Corizon LLC et al
as 5:2019cv06146
Defendant:
Jane Doe 3, Tammie Christopher, Kelly Crisman and others
Plaintiff:
Kaitlin Grace Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fritz, et al v. Corizon Health, Inc. et al
as 6:2019cv03365
Defendant:
Corizon, LLC and Corizon Health, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Sheryl Fritz, Jessica Williams and Jamie Terry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Draper v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2019cv06116
Defendant:
T K Bredeman, J. Cofield, Brenda Shira and others
Plaintiff:
Russell Draper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
