Cases 51 - 60 of 407
HARTER v. CORIZON HEALTH SERVICES, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00753
Defendant:
SPRGUN, CORIZON HEALTH SERVICES, LLC, REED and others
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA HARTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KEEYLEN v. TALBOT et al
as 1:2019cv00190
Defendant:
WEXFORD OF INDIANA LLC, VEYONA SHEPHERD, PAUL A. TALBOT and others
Plaintiff:
VICTOR KEEYLEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. CORIZON HEALTH MEDICAL, INC. et al
as 1:2019cv00054
Plaintiff:
THEODORE DAVIS
Defendant:
PAUL A. TALBOT, CORIZON HEALTH MEDICAL, INC., CAMAY FRANCUM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STURGIS v. MEDICAL CONTRACT MONITORS et al
as 1:2019cv00014
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, WEXFORD CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE, MEDICAL CONTRACT MONITOR(S) and others
Plaintiff:
TERRY LAVALLE STURGIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ABNEY v. CORIZON MEDICAL COMPANY/WEXFORD MEDICAL COMPANY et al
as 1:2018cv03977
Plaintiff:
KEITH D. ABNEY
Defendant:
CORIZON MEDICAL COMPANY/WEXFORD MEDICAL COMPANY, PLAINFIELD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, REBECCA J. TRIVETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARTIN v. ALSIP et al
as 1:2018cv03839
Defendant:
PRAITOR, BARGIT, BYDEM and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY C. MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PAYTON v. TALBOT et al
as 1:2018cv03858
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH SERVICES, CORIZON MEDICAL and PAUL TALBOT
Plaintiff:
KEVIN PAYTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Summers v. Conway et al
as 3:2018cv00982
Defendant:
Angie Heishman, Kelly Mitchell, Joy and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Summers and Charles B Summers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MIDDLETON v. WEXFORD
as 1:2018cv03539
Plaintiff:
JASON MICHAEL MIDDLETON
Defendant:
CORIZON and WEXFORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRIFFITH v. CORIZON, INC. et al
as 1:2018cv03417
Defendant:
WEXFORD OF INDIANA, K. DAUSS, CORIZON, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES F. GRIFFITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
