Cases 41 - 50 of 256
MCCALL v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
as 2:2019cv02568
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CORRECTIONS OFFICER JOHN DOE and CORIZON HEALTH
Plaintiff:
AMEEN MCCALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2019cv01942
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JOHNSON
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 16-18, JOHN DOE 1-3, JOHN DOE 10-12 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARKER v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2019cv01294
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and CORIZON HEALTH INC.
Plaintiff:
KEVIN PARKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALLACE v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2019cv00257
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER JOHNSON, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER FROSTER, BRUCE HERDMAN and others
Plaintiff:
CARZELL WALLACE, JR. and CARZELL WALLACE JUNIOR,
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TALBERT v. CORRECTIONAL DENTAL ASSOCIATES et al
as 2:2018cv05112
Defendant:
SIDDHARTH SAGREIYA, SIGY GEORGE, EDWARD BOWMAN and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES TALBERT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSE v. CORIZON HEALTH INC. et al
as 2:2018cv04650
Plaintiff:
THOMAS ROSE
Defendant:
MS. ROSE and CORIZON HEALTH INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GORDON v. CORIZON HEALTH INC.
as 2:2018cv04490
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER GORDON
Defendant:
CORIZON HEALTH INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEE v. TEMPLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL-EPISCOPAL CAMPUS et al
as 2:2018cv04303
Defendant:
SIDDHARTHA SAGREIYA OR SAGVEIYA, "UNKNOWN" SHELLENBERGER, MEGAN SMITH and others
Plaintiff:
CURTIS LEE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. PHILA. DEPT OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2018cv02110
Plaintiff:
ANDRE V. WILLIAMS, SR.
Defendant:
PHILA. DEPT OF PRISONS, THE WARDEN OF THE DETENTION CENTER and CORIZON HEALTH/PRISON MEDICAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DURHAM v. THE PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM et al
as 2:2018cv02113
Plaintiff:
EDWARD W. DURHAM
Defendant:
THE PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM, CORIZON MEDICAL ASSOCIATES and THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
