Civil Rights Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Hook v. McCray et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv00009
Defendant: Corizon, Inc. Now, R.M.C. Colonel, Dr. Sharma and others
Plaintiff: Christopher W. Hook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hook v. McCray et al
as 1:2020cv21767
Defendant: Corizon, Inc. Now, R.M.C. Colonel, Dr. Sharma and others
Plaintiff: Christopher W. Hook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Honaker v. Corizon Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00431
Plaintiff: Keith Allen Honaker
Defendant: Corizon Inc., Florida Department of Corrections and Centurion Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Teets v. Judd et al
as 8:2017cv00641
Plaintiff: William Jason Teets
Defendant: Grady Judd, Jeff Henry, Jerrice Wagner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Fulton County Jail et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv01932
Plaintiff: Terry Mitchell, Jr.
Defendant: Fulton County Jail, Corizon, Inc., D/O Gardner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MacKay v. Corizon, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00990
Plaintiff: Robert G. MacKay
Defendant: Corizon, Inc., Michael D. Crews, Sara Grace White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Siddiq et al (INMATE 1) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv00581
Plaintiff: Freddie B. Walker
Defendant: Tahir Siddiq , Corizon, Inc. , Kenneth Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Towles v. Corizon Inc et al
as 2:2014cv00884
Plaintiff: Rolland Sean Towles
Miscellaneou: staff attorney
Defendant: Corizon Inc, Siddiq and Beth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Fulton County, Georgia et al
as 1:2013cv03024
Plaintiff: Willie P. Davis, Jr.
Defendant: Fulton County, Georgia, Warden, Fulton County Jail, Corizon, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burton v. Corizon Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv03605
Plaintiff: Curtis D. Burton
Defendant: Corizon Inc. and George Herron

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?