Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Burgess v. Whang
as 22-11172
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Cornelius Campbell Burgess
Defendant / Appellant:
Jennifer Whang, In her official capacity as an Administrative Law Judge, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Martin J. Gruenberg, In his official capacity as Acting Chairman of the FDIC and others
Burgess v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation et al
as 7:2022cv00100
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Campbell Burgess
Defendant:
Judge Jennifer Whang, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Martin J. Gruenberg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
Ty Albright et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv05060
Plaintiff:
Ty Albright, Patricia Allison, Damaris Andrea and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Albright et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00849
Plaintiff:
Ty Albright, Patricia Allison, Damaris Andrea and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Albright et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00849
Plaintiff:
Albright, Ty Albright, Patricia Allison and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cornelius Burgess v. FDIC
as 17-60579
Petitioner:
CORNELIUS CAMPBELL BURGESS, Individually and as an Institution-affiliated Party of Herring Bank, Amarillo Texas (Insured State Nonmember Bank)
Respondent:
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION
Cornelius Burgess v. FDIC
as 17-60579
Petitioner:
Cornelius Campbell Burgess, Individually and as an Institution-affiliated Party of Herring Bank, Amarillo Texas (Insured State Nonmember Bank)
Respondent:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Wortham et al v. City and County of Denver, The et al
as 1:2011cv00773
Plaintiff:
Ashford Wortham and Cornelius Campbell
Defendant:
City and County of Denver, The , Perry (I) Speelman , Perry Speelman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
