Cases 31 - 40 of 60
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01787
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv06245
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv05708
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01841
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv04529
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Laquinn Fisher v. City of Mesa, et al
as 12-16661
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAQUINN FISHER, an individual
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF MESA, UNKNOWN CAMPBELL, named as Sgt. Campbell (Badge No. 10729), invidually and acting on behalf of the the Mesa Police Department, UNKNOWN SPOUSE CAMPBELL, named as Jane Doe Campbell and others
Sandra Dowling, et al v. Joseph Arpaio, et al
as 12-15855
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SANDRA DOWLING and DENNIS DOWLING, husband and wife
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH M. ARPAIO, AVA ARPAIO, husband and wife, MARICOPA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv06737
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Julie Deese v. Wells Fargo Bank, et al
as 10-17296
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JULIE DEESE, a single woman
Defendant - Appellee:
WELLS FARGO BANK, National Association, REEDE REYNOLDS, husband, HEATHER REYNOLDS, wife and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
