Cases 1 - 10 of 159
Guy v. City of Corpus Christi et al
as 2:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
Walter Kevin Guy
Defendant:
City of Corpus Christi, Julianna Siracusa Rivera, Matthew Manning and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Neisen v. Nueces County et al
as 2:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Heather Neisen
Defendant:
Nueces County, Corpus Christi Police Department and City of Corpus Christi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Gonzalez
as 24-40242
Plaintiff:
Derek D. Smith
Defendant:
Javier Gonzalez, Officer, Joe Elrod and City of Corpus Christi
Cambric v. City of Corpus Christi et al
as 2:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Priscilla Cambric
Defendant:
City of Corpus Christi, Tracey Cantu and Al Raymond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-40058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt v. Mission Inn et al
as 2:2024cv00553
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt
Defendant:
Mission Inn, Mission Motel, Rochester Zen Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00229
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Roberts v. City of Corpus Christi, Texas et al
as 2:2023cv00174
Plaintiff:
Margarita "Maggie" Roberts
Defendant:
City of Corpus Christi, Texas, Vince Gutierrez and Micheal Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. City of Corpus Christi Police Department et al
as 2:2022cv00297
Plaintiff:
Derek D. Smith
Defendant:
City of Corpus Christi Police Department and City of Corpus Christi Parks and Recreation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00286
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
