Cases 61 - 70 of 86
v. Shorter et al
as 4:2009cv00438
Defendant:
Caticia Shorter and CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Shorter v. CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA
as 4:2009cv00439
Plaintiff:
Caticia Shorter
Defendant:
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
MOBLEY v. CCA CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA et al
as 5:2009cv00342
Plaintiff:
RAY CHRIS MOBLEY
Defendant:
CCA CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, BCSO FRANK MCKEITHEN, GREG PEEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00339
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00184
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Menefee v. Corrections Corporation of America
as 5:2009cv00108
Plaintiff:
James W. Menefee, Jr.
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Duritsky v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 8:2009cv00291
Plaintiff:
Ricky Duritsky and Ricky Duritsky
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Karen H. DeLoreto and John Doe
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv00528
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv00333
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Pavlisin v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 5:2008cv00298
Plaintiff:
Matthew Pavlisin
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Kevin Hessler and Alexander Diaz
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
