Cases 31 - 40 of 372
Thomson #739059 v. Jones et al
as 1:2013cv00629
Plaintiff:
Peter Thomson #739059
Defendant:
Alfred Jones, Bryan Deeren, Jody Lebarre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Caruso et al
as 1:2013cv12475
Plaintiff:
Michael Brown
Defendant:
Patricia Caruso, Richard McKeon, Dennis M. Straub and others
Michael Gresham v. Kenneth Romanowsky, et al
as 13-1738
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL GRESHAM
Defendant - Appellee:
KENNETH ROMANOWSKY, Warden, DAN HEYNS, DARREL M. STEWART, Deputy Warden and others
Peter Thomson v. Alfred Jones, et al
as 13-1550
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PETER THOMSON
Defendant - Appellee:
ALFRED JONES, Administrative Assistant Southern Region Health Care Services, BRYAN DEEREN, RN - 13, JODY LEBARRE, RN H.U.M. and others
Turner v. Correctional Medical Services et al
as 2:2013cv11783
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Turner
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Corizon Health Inc., Squires and others
King #223983 v. Czop et al
as 1:2013cv00406
Plaintiff:
Lester King #223983
Defendant:
Unknown Czop, Jodie LeBarrge and Correctional Medical Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2013cv00284
Plaintiff:
Robert Allen Baker #182416
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Correctional Medical Services, Inc., Prison Health Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mccormick v. Does et al
as 2:2013cv11098
Plaintiff:
Rosevelt Mccormick
Defendant:
Jane Does and Correctional Medical Services
Shabazz v. Schofield et al
as 3:2013cv00091
Plaintiff:
Fred E. Dean
Defendant:
Derrick Schofield, Catherine Posey, Jim Thrasher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kensu v. Buskirk et al
as 2:2013cv10279
Plaintiff:
Temujin Kensu
Defendant:
Joshua B Buskirk , Jeffrey C Stieve, Panjak Malik and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
