Cases 1 - 10 of 10
WHIDDON v. POWELL et al
as 7:2021cv00161
Plaintiff:
JASON KYLE WHIDDON
Defendant:
Sheriff CARLTON POWELL, KEVIN DENNIS, THOMAS COUNTY JAIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. South Carolina Department of Corrections Medical Services
as 1:2014cv00139
Plaintiff:
Shawn Terrence Nelson
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections Medical Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stevenson v. Miller et al
as 1:2013cv00438
Plaintiff:
Kinney R. Stevenson
Defendant:
Phil Miller, John Doe, Correctional Medical Services and others
Harpo v. Strength et al
as 1:2012cv00039
Plaintiff:
Wilhy Harpo
Defendant:
Ronald Strength, Charles A. Toole, Sr., William E. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harpo v. Strength et al
as 1:2011cv00189
Plaintiff:
Wilhy Harpo
Defendant:
Ronald Strength, Charles A. Toole, Sr., William E. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lord v. Richmond County Jail et al
as 1:2010cv00132
Plaintiff:
Ronald G. Lord
Defendant:
Richmond County Jail, Correctional Medical Services and Augusta Commissioners
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tyler v. Correctional Medical Services
as 1:2010cv00066
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services
Plaintiff:
James Calvin Tyler, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McBride v. Charles B. Webster Detention Center et al
as 1:2010cv00015
Plaintiff:
Larry W. McBride
Defendant:
Charles B. Webster Detention Center, Ronald Strength, Correctional Medical Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kitchens v. Correctional Medical Services
as 1:2010cv00010
Plaintiff:
John Brandon Kitchens
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Strength et al
as 1:2007cv00141
Plaintiff:
Rickey A. Thomas
Defendant:
Ronnie Strength, Correctional Medical Services, FNU Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
