Cases 21 - 30 of 97
Houck v. Corrections Corporation of America, Inc.
as 2:2015cv09586
Plaintiff:
Mindy M. Houck
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Flor v. Corrections Corporation of America
as 1:2015cv00047
Plaintiff:
Sherry Flor
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SHORES v. CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA
as 1:2015cv00574
Plaintiff:
DEREK SHORES
Defendant:
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: Petition for Removal- Civil Rights
Kimberly Doe, et al v. USA, et al
as 15-50331
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KIMBERLY DOE, CONSTANCE ROE, SARAH DOE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, EVELYN HERNANDEZ, former CCA Facility Administrator and others
Castillo v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 4:2015cv00556
Plaintiff:
Jose Angel Castillo
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America , Northeast Ohio Correctional Center and Michael Pugh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Eixenberger et al v. Corrections Corporation of America
as 1:2015cv00027
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America
Plaintiff:
Mark Eixenberger , Mario Vasquez , Mandi Bravo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Walls v. Corrections Corporation of America
as 2:2014cv02201
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America
Plaintiff:
Alexander Walls
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
SANUSI v. CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA
as 2:2014cv07584
Plaintiff:
RASAQ OPEYEMI SANUSI
Defendant:
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Dixon v. Corrections Corporation of America
as 1:2014cv03042
Plaintiff:
Virgil Dixon
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NAGY v. CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA
as 1:2014cv01658
Plaintiff:
SANDRA NAGY
Defendant:
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
