Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Fiskars Finland Oy Ab et al v. Woodland Tools Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00540
Plaintiff:
Fiskars Finland Oy Ab and Fiskars Brands Inc.
Defendant:
Woodland Tools Inc., Lumino, Inc., Ross Gundlach and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Cota v. Ralph Lauren Corporation
as 1:2021cv01089
Plaintiff:
Nicole Cota
Defendant:
Ralph Lauren Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COTA v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2018cv01114
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
MARC C. COTA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cota v. AbbVie Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv08998
Plaintiff:
Marc Cota
Defendant:
AbbVie Inc., Abbott Laboratories, AbbVie Products LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cota v. Pilkington North America Inc
as 1:2012cv00365
Plaintiff:
Richard R Cota
Defendant:
Pilkington North America Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. M.R.T.P., Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv07339
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music, Inc. , Blood Heavy Music , Songs of Golgotha and others
Defendant:
M.R.T.P., Inc., Anthony Prisco and Michael Rossi
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. The R's Six Company LLC et al
as 1:2011cv09235
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music, Inc. , Welsh Witch Music , Fox-Gimbel Productions, Inc. and others
Defendant:
The R's Six Company LLC and J. Michael Ross
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Cota v. BNSF Railway Company
as 3:2011cv00977
Plaintiff:
Rosie Cota
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Cota v. Astrue
as 1:2011cv03719
Plaintiff:
Steven M. Cota
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Cota v. Chicago/All US ESQ Court Staff et al
as 1:2007cv06253
Petitioner:
Arthur Cota
Respondent:
Chicago/All US ESQ Court Staff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
