Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Shaw v. Habitat for Humanity et al
as 2:2024cv02217
Plaintiff:
Tekeva Shaw
Defendant:
Habitat for Humanity, Eula Jackson, Liz Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Covell et al v. Rowland et al
as 1:2023cv00001
Plaintiff:
Joshua M. Covell, Cameron Malugin, Chuck Whitehead and others
Defendant:
Bucky Rowland, Joey Parks, Jeff Ray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Couch v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company
as 3:2022cv00473
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline R. Couch
Defendant:
Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Breach of Contract
Couch v. Sumner et al
as 1:2022cv00066
Plaintiff:
Clifton Couch
Defendant:
Seth Sumner, City Of Athens and The City of Athens, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Rinehart et al v. Couch et al
as 2:2020cv02134
Plaintiff:
William Rinehart and Carol Rinehart
Defendant:
Couch Realty Investment Managers, LLC. and David Couch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Adams et al v. Adient US LLC et al
as 1:2018cv01179
Plaintiff:
Shari Carter, Joyce D Adams, Francene Burton and others
Defendant:
Adient US LLC, Ferro Corporation, Manufacturers Industrial Group, LLC and others
Undetermined:
Circuit Court Clerk Beverly Dunaway
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319
Couch v. United States Government
as 2:2016cv02532
Movant:
John Couch
Respondent:
United States Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
England v. Couch et al
as 1:2015cv00075
Plaintiff:
Herbert Ray England
Defendant:
Lonnie Couch, State of Tennessee, Centerstone Mental Health Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart et al v. Couch, Conville & Blitt LLC
as 1:2015cv01083
Plaintiff:
Nathan R Stewart and Todd B Simpson
Defendant:
Couch, Conville & Blitt LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Couch v. Colvin
as 2:2014cv02994
Plaintiff:
April Couch
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
