Cases 41 - 50 of 378
Johnny Warren v. Mark Napier, et al
as 22-15717
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHNNY LEE WARREN
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK NAPIER, Sheriff at Pima County Jail, LAURA CONOVER, County Attorney at Superior Court, DEBORAH BERNINI, named as Hon. Bernini, Div. 12, Judge at Superior Court and others
Matwyuk v. Arizona, State of et al
as 3:2022cv08082
Plaintiff:
Philip S Matwyuk
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Mark Brnovich, Kingman Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Brown #156811 v. Parker et al
as 2:2022cv00569
Plaintiff:
Patrice E Brown and Patrice Edmond Brown
Defendant:
Amanda Moncayo Parker, Maricopa County Attorney's Office, Arizona, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Devin Andrich v. Michael Cimino, et al
as 22-15141
Petitioner / Appellant:
DEVIN ANDRICH
Respondent / Appellee:
MICHAEL CIMINO, ALLISTER ADEL, Maricopa County Attorney and MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02205
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv09507
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jeane Gregory v. Gust Rosenfeld PLC, et al
as 21-16853
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEANE GREGORY
Defendant / Appellee:
GUST ROSENFELD PLC, MARICOPA COUNTY ATTORNEY, SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA, Maricopa County and others
Paul Isaacson, et al v. Mark Brnovich, et al
as 21-16711
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL A. ISAACSON, M.D., on behalf of himself and his patients, ERIC M. REUSS, M.D., M.P.H,; on behalf of himself and his patients, NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN, INC., Arizona Section and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General, Attorney General of Arizona, in his official capacity, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES, DON HERRINGTON, Interim Director of the Arizona Department of Health Services and others
Defendant:
MICHAEL B. WHITING, County Attorney for Apache County, in his official capacity, BRIAN M. MCINTYRE, County Attorney for Cochise County, in his official capacity, WILLIAM PATRICK RING, County Attorney for Coconino County, in his official capacity and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF MISSOURI, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OR ARKANSAS, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF KANSAS, STATE OF IDAHO, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, STATE OF MONTANA, STATE OF NEBRASKA, STATE OF OHIO, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, STATE
Blackcrow v. Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribal Police Department et al
as 9:2021cv00118
Plaintiff:
Aloysius D. Blackcrow
Defendant:
Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribal Police Department, Brad Plouff, Nate Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paul Isaacson, et al v. Mark Brnovich, et al
as 21-16645
Plaintiff / Appellee:
PAUL A. ISAACSON, M.D., on behalf of himself and his patients, ERIC M. REUSS, M.D., M.P.H,; on behalf of himself and his patients, NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN, INC., Arizona Section and others
Defendant / Appellant:
MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General, Attorney General of Arizona, in his official capacity, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES, DON HERRINGTON, Interim Director of the Arizona Department of Health Services and others
Defendant:
MICHAEL B. WHITING, County Attorney for Apache County, in his official capacity, BRIAN M. MCINTYRE, County Attorney for Cochise County, in his official capacity, WILLIAM PATRICK RING, County Attorney for Coconino County, in his official capacity and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF MISSOURI, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OR ARKANSAS, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF KANSAS, STATE OF IDAHO, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, STATE OF MONTANA, STATE OF NEBRASKA, STATE OF OHIO, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, STATE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
