Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Ford v. North Dakota, State of et al
as 3:2024cv00110
Plaintiff:
Carl L. Ford
Defendant:
North Dakota, State of, Renata J. Olafson Selzer, Brianna Kraft and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Dexter v. English et al
as 1:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Kamy Gwen Dexter
Defendant:
Joshua English, Renaldo Dupree, Ward County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Knorr v. Cass County Jail
as 3:2023cv00240
Plaintiff:
Gerald Knorr
Defendant:
Cass County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Cass County Jail
as 3:2023cv00211
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Williams
Defendant:
Cass County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Kruger v. Ruhl et al
as 3:2023cv00120
Petitioner:
Anthony Eugene Kruger
Respondent:
Sheriff Gary Ruhl and Richland County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hayes v. Cass County Jail, et al.
as 3:2021cv00200
Plaintiff:
Randall Lloyd Hayes
Defendant:
Cass County Jail, Deputy Petersen, Deputy Goldstein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Loggins v. United States et al
as 3:2021cv00114
Defendant:
United States, Cass County Jail and Sanford Health
Plaintiff:
Jonathan David Loggins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Loggins v. United States et al
as 3:2021cv00109
Defendant:
Cass County Sheriffs Department, United States and Cass County Jail
Plaintiff:
Jonathan David Loggins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Loggins v. United States et al
as 3:2021cv00076
Defendant:
United States, Sheriffs Office and Cass County Jail
Plaintiff:
Jonathan David Loggins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hernandez v. Supervalu Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00071
Defendant:
Supervalu Inc., WSI North Dakota, Fargo Cass Public Health and others
Plaintiff:
Luis Ignacio Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
