Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00418
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 American Disabilities Act
May v. Kiefer et al
as 2:2023cv01404
Plaintiff:
Edith Mae May
Defendant:
Doctor, Doctors, Naph Care Medical Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Estate of Joseph Rosenbaum v. Beth et al
as 2:2023cv01128
Plaintiff:
Estate of Joseph Rosenbaum
Defendant:
David Beth, Daniel G Miskinis, Patrick D Patton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Vego v. County of Kenosha et al
as 2:2023cv00992
Plaintiff:
Aaron J Vego
Defendant:
County of Kenosha and Kenosha County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vego v. County of Kenosha et al
as 2:2023cv00775
Plaintiff:
Aaron J Vego
Defendant:
County of Kenosha, NaphCare Medical Department, Officer Thorne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eaton v. County of Kenosha et al
as 2:2022cv01459
Plaintiff:
Robert Eaton
Defendant:
County of Kenosha and Froedtert Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blake v. Beth et al
as 2:2022cv00970
Plaintiff:
Justin Blake
Defendant:
David Beth, Kenosha County of Wisconsin, Kyle Bissonnette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nelson v. County of Kenosha et al
as 2:2022cv00841
Plaintiff:
Kari Nelson
Defendant:
Kenosha County, David Beth, Ltd Daniel Ruth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Huber v. Beth et al
as 2:2021cv00969
Plaintiff:
John Huber
Defendant:
David G Beth, Daniel G Miskinis, Eric Larsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Larson v. Doe et al
as 2:2018cv01832
Defendant:
Jane/John Doe, County of Kenosha, John/Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Harvey Eugene Larson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
