Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01531
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC, d/b/a AT&T Mobility v. County of Marin California
as 3:2020cv07915
Plaintiff:
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC
Defendant:
County of Marin California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
City of Seattle Washington, et al v. FCC, et al
as 20-72734
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Petitioner:
CITY OF SAN RAMON, California, CITY OF SANTA CRUZ, California, CITY OF CORONADO, California and others
Intervenor:
CTIA - THE WIRELESS ASSOCIATION, COUNTY OF MARIN, California, SAN FRANCISCO CITY AND COUNTY, California and others
Seaplane Adventures, LLC v. County of Marin, California
as 3:2020cv06222
Plaintiff:
Seaplane Adventures
Defendant:
County of Marin, California
The Alliance for Communication, et al v. FCC, et al
as 19-1221
Petitioner:
The City of Portland, Maine, Alliance for Community Media, City of Palo Alto, California and others
Respondent:
United States of America and Federal Communications Commission
City and County of San Francisco et al v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 4:2019cv04717
Plaintiff:
City and County of San Francisco and County of Santa Clara
Defendant:
Acting Secretary of Kevin McAleenen, Department of Homeland Security, Acting Director Kenneth T. Cuccinelli and others
Petitioner:
Community Healthcare Network, Presidents' Alliance on Higher Education and Immigration, America's Essential Hospitals and others
Amicus Curiae:
The Cities of Los Angeles and Oakland, California; Harris County, Texas; and 26 Additional Cities, Counties, and Local Government Agencies, City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, City of Seattle, Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
County of San Mateo, CA, et al v. Peabody Energy Corporation
as 19-1767
Debtor:
In re: Peabody Energy Corporation
Appellant:
County of Marin, California, City of Imperial Beach, California and County of San Mateo, California
Appellee:
Peabody Energy Corporation
Not Yet Classified:
Office of U.S. Trustee
City of Austin, Texas, et al v. FCC, et al
as 19-70341
Intervenor:
CITY OF MEDINA, WASHINGTON, CITY OF LACEY, WASHINGTON, CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES, CALIFORNIA and others
Petitioner:
CITY OF SCARSDALE, NEW YORK, HOWARD COUNTY, MARYLAND, CITY OF GAITHERSBURG, MARYLAND and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
American Public Power Assoc. v. FCC, et al
as 19-70339
Petitioner:
AMERICAN PUBLIC POWER ASSOCIATION
Intervenor:
CITY OF LACEY, WASHINGTON, CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES, CALIFORNIA, CITY OF COCONUT CREEK, FLORIDA and others
Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
City of Eugene, Oregon, et al v. FCC, et al
as 19-70344
Intervenor:
CITY OF LACEY, WASHINGTON, CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES, CALIFORNIA, CITY OF COCONUT CREEK, FLORIDA and others
Petitioner:
CITY OF HUNTSVILLE, ALABAMA, CITY OF EUGENE, OREGON and CITY OF BOWIE, MARYLAND
Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
