Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Kruse v. City of Elk River, The et al
as 0:2023cv02207
Plaintiff:
Kelsey Ann Kruse
Defendant:
City of Elk River, The, Elk River Police Department, David Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-3652
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jidoefor v. United States Marshal Service et al
as 0:2022cv01777
Plaintiff:
Okwuchukwu Jideofor and Okwuchukwu Jidoefor
Defendant:
County of Sherburne, The, MEND Correctional Care LLC, Wendy Zitzloff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brenizer et al v. The County of Sherburne et al
as 0:2021cv01301
Defendant:
Joel Brott, Mark Frittle, The County of Sherburne and others
Plaintiff:
Kyle-William: Brenizer, Travis R. Fairbanks, Johnnie L. Haynes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kruse v. Elk River, City of, The et al
as 0:2021cv01262
Defendant:
Police Officer Evan Patullo, Police Officer Dale Olmscheid, Defendant Employee Samuel Hines and others
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff/Trustee Kelsey Ann Kruse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. County of Sherburne et al
as 0:2020cv01606
Defendant:
Mark Fritel, Pat Carr, County of Sherburne and others
Plaintiff:
Randolph Kendrick Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2018cv01237
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Kruchten v. Sherburne Health and Human Services Department et al
as 0:2014cv01674
Plaintiff:
Bryan Joseph Kruchten
Defendant:
Sherburne Health and Human Services Department and County of Sherburne, Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nyhus v. City of Blaine et al
as 0:2013cv02878
Defendant:
City of Blaine , City of Bloomington , City of Brainerd and others
Plaintiff:
Natalie Ann Nyhus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
