Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Local 210 Pension Fund et al v. Super Pack Warehouse & Distribution Inc.
as 1:2022cv09465
Plaintiff:
Local 210 Pension Fund, Local 210 Scholarship and Education Fund, Local 210 Legal Fund and others
Defendant:
Super Pack Warehouse & Distribution Inc. agent of d/b/a Super pak Courier Services, Inc. and Super Pack Warehouse & Distribution Inc. doing business as Super pak Courier Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Civil Enforcement of Employee Benefits
Bazycki et al v. Pronto Delivery Service LLC et al
as 3:2021cv01042
Plaintiff:
Marlo Bazycki and Stanley Bazycki
Defendant:
Pronto Delivery Courier and Logistics LLC, Pronto Delivery Service LLC and JR Insulation LLC
Not Classified By Court:
Adam B. LeCrone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Bozian v. The Courier-Journal, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00282
Plaintiff:
L.D. Bozian
Defendant:
The Courier-Journal, Inc. and Gannett Co. Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund et al v. Whittaker Builders, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv02020
Plaintiff:
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund and Arthur H. Bunte, Jr
Defendant:
Whittaker Builders, Inc., GW Lumber, LLC, New Town Courier, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
TEAMSTERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND OF PHILADELPHIA AND VICINITY et al v. COURIER-POST COMPANY
as 1:2015cv00844
Plaintiff:
TEAMSTERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND OF PHILADELPHIA AND VICINITY , TEAMSTERS PENSION TRUST FUND OF PHILADELPHIA AND VICINITY and WILLIAM J. EINHORN
Defendant:
COURIER-POST COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Lavender v. UNUM et al
as 2:2011cv04319
Plaintiff:
Susan Lavender
Defendant:
UNUM and News-Courier of Athens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SCARPONE et al v. COURIER POST
as 2:2009cv05780
Plaintiff:
LEE SCARPONE and NEWSPAPER & MAGAZINE EMPLOYEES UNION PENSION FUND
Defendant:
COURIER POST
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
