Cases 1 - 10 of 12
SAMPEY v. TOWNSHIP OF WEST ORANGE et al
as 2:2024cv05691
Plaintiff:
AMANDA SAMPEY
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF WEST ORANGE, TOWNSHIP OF WEST ORANGE POLICE DEPARTMENT, Chief of Police JAMES ABBOTT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
MALEK v. DUFFY et al
as 2:2023cv04344
Defendant:
SAFE HORIZON, CORPORATION COUNSEL, MATTHEW DUFFY and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MALEK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PEPE v. GORDON et al
as 2:2022cv03470
Plaintiff:
MARIE M PEPE
Defendant:
ANDREA GORDON, CITY OF NEWARK, NEW JERSEY, POLICE OFFICER JOHN DOE #1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pepe
as 1:2022cv03470
Plaintiff:
Marie M Pepe
Defendant:
ANDREA GORDON, CITY OF NEWARK, NEW JERSEY, POLICE OFFICER JOHN DOE #1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
SHARIFI v. COUNTY OF MERCER et al
as 3:2021cv18097
Plaintiff:
PARASTU SHARIFI
Defendant:
COUNTY OF MERCER, TOWNSHIP OF EAST WINDSOR, EAST WINDSOR MUNICIPAL COURT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GAGE v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2019cv09098
Defendant:
MARGARET GOODZEIT, LAW OFFICE OF RAJAN PATEL, OWEN FINANCIAL CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS I GAGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BEN-HAIM et al v. EDRI et al
as 2:2015cv03877
Plaintiff:
SHARON BEN-HAIM and OFIR BEN-HAIM
Defendant:
DANIEL EDRI, DAVID BAR SHILTON, EYAL YOSEF and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ZIRKIND v. EPSTEIN et al
as 3:2015cv00147
Plaintiff:
HARLOW ZIRKIND
Defendant:
MENDEL EPSTEIN, STATE OF NEW YORK, MAZAL ZIRKIND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WOLF v. ESCALA et al
as 2:2014cv05985
Plaintiff:
KARIN WOLF
Defendant:
GERALD C. ESCALA, EDWARD J. CRANE , PETER VAN AULEN, ESQ. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01910
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
