Cases 31 - 40 of 123
Johnson v. Court of Criminal Appeals
as 6:2019cv00413
Petitioner:
Richard James Johnson
Respondent:
Court of Criminal Appeals
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv02254
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2019cv00194
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Davis v. Court of Criminal Appeals et al
as 4:2019cv01618
Petitioner:
Terry Matthew Davis
Respondent:
United States District Court, Court of Criminal Appeals and Public of Safety
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burleson v. Darnell et al
as 5:2019cv00062
Defendant:
Matt Powell, Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, Texas Department of Criminal Justice and others
Plaintiff:
Tryone Lee Burleson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moses v. City of San Antonio et al
as 5:2018cv01302
Defendant:
City of San Antonio, Bexar County, FNU Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Maurice A. Moses, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramos v. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas et al
as 1:2018cv00977
Defendant:
Judge Sharon Keller, Judge Elsa Alcala, Judge Scott Walker and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Moreno Ramos and Roberto Moreno Ramos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnes v. United States of America et al
as 1:2018cv00952
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice, Other Undisclosed BODA Attorneys, Russell Travis and others
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Barnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv02762
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Angelina County D.A. Office et al
as 2:2018cv00336
Defendant:
Angelina County D.A., Court of Criminal Appeals, Angelina County Defense Attorney Winfred III and others
Plaintiff:
Richard James Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
