Cases 1 - 10 of 523
Isham v. Richardson et al
as 3:2024cv00142
Plaintiff:
Ralph E. Isham
Defendant:
Chief Craig Richardson, Sergeant Kenneth Lloyd, Scott Kinderdine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Craig v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01921
Plaintiff:
Kayla Craig
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Maurice v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01887
Plaintiff:
Craig Maurice
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Moraski v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01794
Plaintiff:
Craig Moraski
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Craig
as 2:2024cv01727
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Michael Craig
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00626
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Herold v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01570
Plaintiff:
Craig Herold
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Epps v. Bard Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01147
Plaintiff:
Craig Epps
Defendant:
Bard Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Craig v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00595
Plaintiff:
Melanie Craig
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wolfe v. Hocking County Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2024cv00535
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Wolfe
Defendant:
Hocking County Sheriff's Department, Chief Deputy Caleb Moritz, Deputy Craig Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
