Cases 1 - 10 of 67
CUNNINGHAM v. WALLACE & GRAHAM, P.A. et al
as 1:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
CRAIG CUNNINGHAM
Defendant:
Bill Graham, Joel R Rhine, P Mark Doby and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act
SMITH v. USA
as 1:2023cv00310
Petitioner:
JABRELL CRAIG SMITH
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
WASHINGTON et al v. TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv00246
Plaintiff:
AMERICA WASHINGTON, ANGELA ADAMS, BASHAWN LAWRENCE and others
Defendant:
TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC., TMX FINANCE OF VIRGINIA, INC., TITLEMAX OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
BUTLER v. USA
as 1:2023cv00145
Petitioner:
CRAIG LAMONT BUTLER
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01065
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
JONES v. STATE JUDGES et al
as 1:2022cv00713
Plaintiff:
MR. CRAIG Q. JONES
Defendant:
STATE JUDGES, CLERK OF COURT and SUPERIOR COURT GUILFORD COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. USA
as 1:2022cv00343
Petitioner:
CRAIG QUINZEL JONES
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
SEAGRAVES v. MOORE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER et al
as 1:2022cv00111
Plaintiff:
CRAIG SEAGRAVES
Defendant:
MOORE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER and CAPTAIN WILLIAM FLINT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NAUTILUS INSURANCE COMPANY v. BAYES et al
as 1:2022cv00064
Plaintiff:
NAUTILUS INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
KEAVE W. BAYES, CRAIG RUTLAND and KENNETH DARRELL ANDREWS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
