Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 16
JORDAN v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv15601
Plaintiff: CRAIG ANTHONY JORDAN
Defendant: NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Craig Jordan v. Gary Lanigan, et al
as 19-1999
Plaintiff / Appellant: CRAIG ANTHONY JORDAN
Defendant / Appellee: GARY LANIGAN, Commissioner N.J. Department of Corrections and JAMES T. PLOUSIS, Chairman / Director N.J. State Parole Board
Jordan v. Cobb County Adult Detention Center et al
as 1:2017cv02795
Plaintiff: Craig A. Jordan
Defendant: Cobb County Adult Detention Center, Lops and Carriker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jordan v. Moore et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2017cv00095
Plaintiff: Craig A. Jordan
Defendant: Jewell Moore and Rogers State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jordan v. Mobley et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2017cv00092
Plaintiff: Craig A. Jordan
Defendant: Mobley and McFarlane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jordan v. Cherokee County Courts et al
as 1:2017cv02508
Plaintiff: Craig A. Jordan
Defendant: Cherokee County Courts and Cherokee County Public Defenders Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jordan v. Donavan et al
as 4:2017cv00136
Petitioner: Craig A. Jordan
Respondent: Donald R. Donavan, Magistrate Court and Paulding County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jordan v. Paulding County Detention Center et al
as 4:2017cv00121
Plaintiff: Craig A. Jordan
Defendant: Paulding County Detention Center, Gary Gullege, K Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jordan v. Reynolds et al
as 1:2017cv01660
Petitioner: Craig A. Jordan
Respondent: D. Victor Reynolds and Magistrate Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01474
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?