Cases 51 - 60 of 266
CUNNINGHAM v. CELLCO PARTNERSHIP
as 2:2020cv06192
Petitioner:
CRAIG CUNNINGHAM
Respondent:
CELLCO PARTNERSHIP
Cunningham v. Spring Oaks Capital LLC
as 4:2020cv00383
Plaintiff:
Craig Cunningham
Defendant:
Spring Oaks Capital LLC and John/Jane Does 1 - 5
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
CUNNINGHAM v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv73618
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CRAIG CUNNINGHAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cunningham v. Assured Auto Group, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv00141
Defendant:
National Auto Protection Corp., John/Jane Does 1 - 5, Northcoast Warranty Services, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Craig Cunningham
Cunningham v. USA Auto Protection, LLC et al
as 4:2020cv00142
Defendant:
Paylink Payment Plans, LLC dba Paylink Direct, Lyndon Southern Insurance Company, Phillip Tripoli and others
Plaintiff:
Craig Cunningham
Cunningham v. Britereal Management, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv00144
Plaintiff:
Craig Cunningham
Defendant:
Britereal Management, Inc., Anna Yeh and John/Jane Does 1-5
Cunningham v. Aragon Advertising, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv01318
Defendant:
Humana Inc., Clearlink Insurance Agency, Aragon Advertising, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Craig Cunningham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Barrett et al v. Intellectual Jewels of Tera Communications, LLC
as 1:2020mi00029
Plaintiff:
Joseph Barrett, Craig Cunningham and Andrew Perrong
Defendant:
Intellectual Jewels of Tera Communications, LLC
Cunningham v. 360 Health Services, LLC et al
as 4:2020cv00109
Defendant:
Nicholas Pape, Nicholas Jenkins, Dr. Howard Newman and others
Plaintiff:
Craig Cunningham
Cunningham v. Advanced Tele-genetic Counseling, LLC et al
as 4:2020cv00143
Defendant:
Speciality Drug Testing, LLC, Elizabeth Turner, Advanced Tele-genetic Counseling, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Craig Cunningham
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
