Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Crawley v. The Long Island Railroad Company
as 1:2012cv07222
Plaintiff:
Caren Crawley
Defendant:
The Long Island Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
McNeil et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2012cv06379
Plaintiff:
Lonnie McNeil , Clinton Crawley and Payton Ransom
Defendant:
The City of New York , John Does, Mary Rowes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. City of Troy et al
as 1:2012cv00224
Plaintiff:
David Brian Mitchell
Defendant:
City of Troy, Harry Tutunjian and Daniel Crawley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv06167
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Crawley v. Sposato et al
as 2:2011cv06246
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Crawley
Defendant:
John Doe, John Doe and Michael Sposato
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goldston v. The City of Troy, New York et al
as 1:2010cv00021
Plaintiff:
Colleen J. Goldston
Defendant:
The City of Troy, New York, Harry Tutunjian, Daniel Crawley and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Coca-Cola North America et al v. Crawley Juice, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv03259
Plaintiff:
Coca-Cola North America, Coca-Cola North America, Odwalla, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Crawley Juice, Inc. and Howard W. Crawley, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Crawley v. Helas et al
as 9:2009cv00044
Plaintiff:
Frank Crawley
Defendant:
Michael Helas, William Phillips, T. Corey and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv03328
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Thompson v. Carlsen et al
as 9:2008cv00487
Plaintiff:
Derrick Thompson
Defendant:
Mr. Carlsen, White, Franza and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
