Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Chapman v. Franklin County Board of Commissioners et al
as 2:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Tasha Chapman
Defendant:
Franklin County Board of Commissioners, Commissioner John O'Grady, Kevin L Boyce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Crawley v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00799
Plaintiff:
Paul E Crawley, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Estate of Keandre Bost v. Franklin County/Franklin County Board of Commissioners et al
as 2:2022cv04476
Plaintiff:
Andre L Corrothers and Estate of Keandre Bost
Defendant:
Commissioner Kevin Boyce, Commissioner John O'Grady, Commissioner Erica Crawley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Crawley v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv04050
Plaintiff:
Robert Crawley
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Justice v. Baldwin et al
as 2:2022cv02207
Plaintiff:
Lotus Justice and Lotus Justice, restricted
Defendant:
Dallas Baldwin, Franklin County Sheriffs Department, Armor Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crawley v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv05643
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Crawley
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Crawley v. CR Bard et al
as 2:2020cv01249
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and CR Bard
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Crawley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Crawley v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00262
Plaintiff:
Darryle Crawley
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Crawley v. USA
as 1:2016cv00597
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Ronald Crawley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Crawley v. Bradshaw
as 1:2015cv00081
Petitioner:
William H Crawley
Respondent:
Margaret Bradshaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
