Cases 1 - 7 of 7
PENA et al v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION et al
as 2:2015cv01476
Plaintiff:
MARIA PENA and ISAIAS RODRIGUES
Defendant:
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, CREDIT SUISSE FINANCIAL CORP., CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2409
McDonald v. Credit Suisse Financial Corp. et al
as 4:2015cv00469
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey McDonald
Defendant:
Credit Suisse Financial Corp., Mortgage Electronic Registration Services, Inc. , Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Macon County Illinois et al v Merscorp Inc et al
as 2:2012cv02214
Plaintiff:
Macon County Illinois and Mary A. Eaton
Defendant:
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. , Bank of America, N.A. , Citimortgage, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DeJesus v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems et al
as 1:2012cv00075
Plaintiff:
Jose A DeJesus
Defendant:
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems , Credit Suisse Financial Corp. and Vanderbilt Mortgage and Finance, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ferraro et al v. Realty USA et al
as 1:2008cv00778
Plaintiff:
Christopher Ferraro, Michele Ferraro and Ron Reale
Defendant:
Realty USA, Philip J. Wagner, Philip Wagner, Sr. and others
Cross Claimant:
Samual Gamello and Old Kinderhook Appraisal Services
Cross Defendant:
Adirondack Funding, Samual Gamello, Adams Appraisal Services and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ferraro et al v. Realty USA et al
as 1:2008cv01590
Plaintiff:
Christopher Ferraro, Michele Ferraro and Ron Reale
Defendant:
Realty USA, Philip J. Wagner, Philip Wagner, Sr. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Martin v. Fitzpatrick Newil St. Hill Dodson, Esq. et al
as 1:2008cv01311
Plaintiff:
Jean Martin
Defendant:
Fitzpatrick Newil St. Hill Dodson, Esq., Worldwide Marketing USA, Inc., Pinhas Brown and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
