Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Cripe v. Glidden
as 3:2017cv00745
Plaintiff:
Tyler D. Cripe
Defendant:
Brian Glidden, Fayette County Jail, Dr. Fatoki and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gregory Cripe, et al v. Henkel Corporation, et al
as 17-1231
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY L. CRIPE and TAMMY CRIPE
Defendant - Appellee:
HENKEL CORPORATION and NATIONAL STARCH & CHEMICAL COMPANY
Prosapio v. Cripe Mobile Home Transport et al
as 1:2015cv04231
Defendant:
Cripe Mobile Home Transport and Jeffrey D Burton
Plaintiff:
Carol Ann Prosapio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364
CRIPE v. COLVIN
as 1:2015cv00405
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Plaintiff:
ANITA J. CRIPE
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Cripe v. AbbVie Inc et al
as 1:2014cv00843
Plaintiff:
Robert Cripe
Defendant:
AbbVie Inc and Abbott Laboratories Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cripe et al v. Henkel Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv00829
Plaintiff:
Gregory L Cripe and Tammy Cripe
Defendant:
Henkel Corporation and National Starch & Chemical Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Daveri Development Group LLC et al v. Village of Wheeling, Illinois
as 1:2012cv07419
Plaintiff:
Daveri Development Group LLC , North/Northwest Suburban Task Force for Individuals with Mental Illness , Lynn Cripe and others
Defendant:
Village of Wheeling, Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00124
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Pennsylvania Lumbermens Mutual Insurance Company v. Cripe Mobile Home Transport LLC et al
as 3:2009cv00291
Plaintiff:
Pennsylvania Lumbermens Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
Cripe Mobile Home Transport LLC, Cripe Mobile Home Transport LLC and W O Moss Regional Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
