Cases 1 - 10 of 16
NAWG, et al v. Xavier Becerra, et al
as 20-16758
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ASSOCIATED INDUSTRIES OF MISSOURI, AGRIBUSINESS ASSOCIATION OF IOWA, CROPLIFE AMERICA and others
Defendant:
LAUREN ZEISE, In Her Official Capacity as Director of the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment
Defendant / Appellant:
XAVIER BECERRA, In His Official Capacity as Attorney General of the State of California
National Association of Wheat Growers et al v. Zeise et al
as 2:2017cv02401
Plaintiff:
Associated Industries of Missouri, Agribusiness Association of Iowa, National Corn Growers Association and others
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra and Lauren Zeise
Amicus Curiae:
State of Iowa, State of Indiana, The National Health Federation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
LULAC, et al v. Andrew Wheeler, et al
as 17-71636
Petitioner:
LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN CITIZENS, PESTICIDE ACTION NETWORK NORTH AMERICA, NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL and others
Respondent:
ANDREW WHEELER, Administrator of United States Environmental Protection Agency, SCOTT PRUITT, Administrator of United States Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Intervenor:
STATE OF NEW YORK, STATE OF NEW YORK, ET AL., STATE OF MARYLAND and others
Amicus Curiae:
DOW AGROSCIENCES LLC, MIGRANT CLINICIANS NETWORK, HEALTH PROFESSIONAL ORGANIZATIONS and others
Center for Biological Diversi, et al v. EPA
as 15-5168
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Center for Biological Diversity, Center for Food Safety and Defenders of Wildlife
Defendant - Appellee:
Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee:
E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company, Syngenta Crop Protection LLP and CropLife America
Center for Biological Diversit, et al v. USEPA, et al
as 14-16977
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and PESTICIDE ACTION NETWORK NORTH AMERICA, non-profit organizations
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
CROPLIFE AMERICA, RESPONSIBLE INDUSTRY FOR A SOUND ENVIRONMENT ("RISE"), SOUTHERN CROP PRODUCTION ASSOCIATION and others
CropLife America v. OSHA
as 12-1231
Petitioner:
CropLife America
Respondent:
Occupational Safety & Health Administration
Center for Biological Diversity et al v. Environmental Protection Agency et al
as 3:2011cv00293
Plaintiff:
Center for Biological Diversity and Pesticide Action Network North America
Defendant:
Environmental Protection Agency and Gina McCarthy
Not Yet Classified:
CropLife America, Responsible Industry for a Sound Environment, Southern Crop Production Association and others
Intervenor:
American Chemistry Council
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
National Corn Growers Assoc., et al v. EPA, et al
as 09-1284
Petitioner:
National Corn Growers Association, National Sunflower Association, National Potato Council and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Lisa Perez Jackson, Administrator
Amicus Curiae For Respondent:
American Bird Conservancy, Inc., Beyond Pesticides, Defenders of Wildlife and others
Amicus Curiae For Petitioner:
CropLife America
Movant-Amicus Curiae For Petitioner:
CropLife America
Tafas v. Dudas et al
as 1:2007cv00846
Plaintiff:
Triantafyllos Tafas and Triantafyllos Tafas
Defendant:
Jon Dudas and The United States Patent and Trademark Office
Amicu:
Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, Biotechnology Industry Organization, Elan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation, SmithKline Beecham Corporation, SmithKline Beecham Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Croplife America v. EPA
as 07-3191
Petitioner:
CROPLIFE AMERICA and RISE (RESPONSIBLE INDUSTRY FOR A SOUND ENVIRONMENT)
Amicus Curiae:
AGRI RETAILERS ASSN, AMER SOYBEAN ASSN, AMERICAN MOSQUITO CONTROL ASSOCIATION and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
