Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Grissom v. Jones et al
as 3:2022cv00290
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Grissom
Defendant:
Dental Assistant Jones, Dental Assistant R Sobrito, DDS Charles R Utley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Grissom v. Jones et al
as 3:2022cv00291
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Grissom
Defendant:
Dental Assistant Jones, Dental Assistant R. Sobrito, Charles R. Utley, DDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Grissom v. Jones et al
as 3:2021cv00791
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Grissom
Defendant:
Dental Assistant Jones, Charles R. Utley, DDS, Dental Assistant R. Sobrito and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lockhart v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 1:2021cv00710
Defendant:
Alyssa D Emery, Erin Schaible, Joe Johnson #22 and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick O. Lockhart, K. L. and B. L.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Range v. Van Metre et al
as 1:2020cv00123
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Stacey, Magistrate Judge Michael Nachmanoff and others
Plaintiff:
Davetta Lynn Range
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. Brock et al
as 1:2014cv00586
Plaintiff:
Roxanne Jenkins
Defendant:
Thomas Brock, Gregory Scott, Stephen Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00707
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00133
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Minns v. Commonwealth Of Virginia et al
as 2:2009cv00283
Plaintiff:
E. George Minns
Defendant:
Commonwealth Of Virginia, Bill Mims, William (Bill) Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Crump v. Christie et al
as 3:2007cv00244
Plaintiff:
Thomas A. Crump
Defendant:
Mark C. Christie, Mark C. Christie, Theodore V. Morrison, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
