Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Jenkins v. Brock et al
as 1:2014cv00586
Plaintiff:
Roxanne Jenkins
Defendant:
Thomas Brock, Gregory Scott, Stephen Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00707
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00133
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Crump v. Social Security
as 7:2013cv00007
Plaintiff:
Janet M. Crump
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Defendant:
Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Crump v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
as 3:2012cv00833
Plaintiff:
Shelia Crump
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury/ Motor Vehicle
Custom Tree Care, Inc. v. Crump Construction, LLC et al
as 3:2012cv00092
Plaintiff:
Custom Tree Care, Inc.
Defendant:
Crump Construction, LLC and Arch Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Crump v. USA
as 7:2012cv80402
Petitioner:
Jamal Edward Crump
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Mondrey et al v. Waste Management, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv00546
Plaintiff:
Thomas Mondrey, Thomas Mondrey, Craig Anderson and others
Defendant:
Waste Management, Inc. and Waste Management of Virginia, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Minns v. Commonwealth Of Virginia et al
as 2:2009cv00283
Plaintiff:
E. George Minns
Defendant:
Commonwealth Of Virginia, Bill Mims, William (Bill) Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Crump v. Mack
as 6:2008cv00017
Plaintiff:
Jerome Crump
Defendant:
Darlene Mack, Hilda Stevens, Stephanie Prokity and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
