Cases 1 - 10 of 48
CRUTCHFIELD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv25957
Plaintiff:
ROBERT CRUTCHFIELD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CRUTCHFIELD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv18330
Plaintiff:
MALCOM CRUTCHFIELD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CRUTCHFIELD v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv11785
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA PAUL CRUTCHFIELD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CRUTCHFIELD v. Carnival Corporation
as 1:2023cv21489
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY CRUTCHFIELD
Defendant:
Carnival Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
ARDIS v. DICKEY et al
as 3:2023cv07017
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MICHAEL ARDIS
Defendant:
DARLENE DICKEY, WILLIAM EDDINS, SARAH HARPER CRUTCHFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ARDIS v. DICKEY et al
as 4:2023cv00119
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MICHAEL ARDIS
Defendant:
DARLENE DICKEY, WILLIAM EDDINS, SARAH HARPER CRUTCHFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BRAZILL v. BRANNON et al
as 5:2023cv00067
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL R BRAZILL
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER R BRANNON, JONATHAN JONES, GLENN E HANCOCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murzike v. Williams et al
as 3:2023cv00098
Plaintiff:
James T. Murzike
Defendant:
R. Williams, J. Taylor, R. Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRUTCHFIELD v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv00422
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH CRUTCHFIELD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CRUTCHFIELD v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv23487
Plaintiff:
DAVID JAMES CRUTCHFIELD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
