Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Dodd v. Indiana Department of Correction et al
as 3:2022cv00110
Plaintiff:
Jermaine D'Shann Dodd
Defendant:
Indiana Department of Correction, Ron Neal, Mark Newkirk and others
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CUEVAS v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2020cv00792
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL CUEVAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CUEVAS v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2019cv03864
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
JACOB CUEVAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CUEVAS v. NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION et al
as 1:2019cv00321
Defendant:
NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION and TEXAS LUTHERAN UNIVERSITY
Plaintiff:
ERIC CUEVAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cuevas v. City of Goshen et al
as 3:2017cv00886
Plaintiff:
Fernando Cuevas
Defendant:
City of Goshen and Gregory Stuart Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AGNEW v. INDIANAPOLIS METRO POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2010cv01006
Plaintiff:
EZELL AGNEW, JR.
Defendant:
OFFICER B BENTLEY, OFFICER G CUEVAS, OFFICER G DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DE LA CRUZ-CUEVAS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2009cv00342
Petitioner:
EVERARDO DE LA CRUZ-CUEVAS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00685
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
CUEVAS et al v. HAMILTON COUNTY INDIANA et al
as 1:2008cv00062
Plaintiff:
NICKOLAS B. CUEVAS, T. C., A. C. and others
Defendant:
HAMILTON COUNTY INDIANA, NEIGHBORHOOD CHRISTIAN LEGAL CLINIC, JOSH ABEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
