Cases 11 - 20 of 113
Curry v. CR Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2022cv00892
Plaintiff:
Steven Curry
Defendant:
CR Bard Incorporated and Davol, Inc,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Curry, Jr. v. Clark et al
as 2:2022cv00685
Plaintiff:
Raymond Curry, Jr.
Defendant:
Shiseido Americas Corporation, City of Obetz Police Department, Franklin County, Ohio Prosecutor's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curry et al v. Jerome Township, Ohio
as 2:2022cv00153
Plaintiff:
Harold E. Curry, Vivian Curry and AMH Development
Defendant:
Jerome Township and Jerome Township, Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Brown v. Sivert, et al
as 1:2021cv01630
Plaintiff:
Charles Brown
Defendant:
SGT. Buddy Sivert, City of Lorain, Police Officer Steyven G. Curry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01572
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01455
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Currie v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv02022
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Eleanor Currie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Health Care Bridge, Inc., et al.
as 1:2020cv02230
Defendant:
HEALTH CARE BRIDGE, INC. and JANUARY CURRY
Plaintiff:
SEPTEMBER JONES
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Peace v. Director, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction et al
as 4:2020cv00713
Plaintiff:
Todd E. Peace and Tara T. Peace
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Ms. Melinda Taylor, S. Curry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peace v. Director, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction et al
as 1:2020cv00215
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Director, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, Ms. Melinda Taylor and others
Plaintiff:
Tara T Peace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
