Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Pierre v. Aurora Loan Services, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv01572
Plaintiff:
Gerard M. Pierre
Defendant:
Aurora Loan Services, LLC, Aurora Bank FSB, Aurora Commercial Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2412
USA v. $6,026.00 in United States Currency
as 1:2013cv00812
Defendant:
$6,026.00 in United States Currency
Plaintiff:
USA
Interested_party:
Lacedrick Curry
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Lunn et al
as 1:2012cv02767
Plaintiff:
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Geoffrey H. Lunn, Darlene A. Bishop and Vincent G. Curry
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv02470
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv02471
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Quals et al v. Lunn et al
as 1:2011cv01453
Plaintiff:
Derrick A. Quals , Hybrid Finance, Limited and F Cubed.ca Investments, Limited
Defendant:
Geoffrey H. Lunn, Michael Schmidt, Vincent Curry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00254
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Aurit v. Douglas County District Court et al
as 1:2010cv02703
Plaintiff:
Todd Anthony Aurit
Defendant:
Douglas County District Court, Nancy Hopf, Paul King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aurit et al v. King et al
as 1:2010cv02698
Petitioner:
Todd Anthony Aurit
Respondent:
Nancy Hopf, Paul King, Richard Cashette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riddle et al v. Hickenlooper et al
as 1:2010cv01857
Plaintiff:
Joelle Riddle , Gary Hausler , Kathleen Curry and others
Defendant:
William Ritter and Bernie Buescher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
