Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv00030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
POPE v. SPRAYBERRY et al
as 4:2022cv00203
Plaintiff:
FRANKIE WAYNE POPE
Defendant:
Warden KEVIN SPRAYBERRY, WILLIAM LESLIE KIRBY, III, KIRBY AND KIRBY LAW FIRM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KING v. HERRING et al
as 5:2022cv00176
Plaintiff:
EDDIE JAMES KING
Defendant:
WADE W HERRING, III and ALISON L CURRIE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CURRY v. G & S GAS SERVICE INC
as 5:2022cv00088
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CURRY
Defendant:
G & S GAS SERVICE INC
3Rd Party Defendant:
ROADSAFE TRAFFIC SYSTEMS INC, JAMES R HOOKER and LISK TRUCKING INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
CURRY v. CHAMBERS et al
as 4:2021cv00161
Petitioner:
DARRYL BEARNARD CURRY
Respondent:
Warden BRIAN CHAMBERS and WARDEN DESHAWN JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GLINSEY v. CREMIN et al
as 4:2021cv00026
Defendant:
Captain JEFFREY STEWART, Lieutenant Colonel JAMES C CREMIN and CSM LARRY E CURRY
Plaintiff:
SHANTICE CHEATHAM GLINSEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CURRY v. JASPER et al
as 4:2020cv00223
Defendant:
Landstar Ranger, Inc, Gayle A Jasper and LANDSTAR RANGER INC
Plaintiff:
Vickie L. Curry and VICKIE L CURRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00142
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
CASSADY v. DOZIER et al
as 5:2017cv00495
Plaintiff:
DAVID DWAYNE CASSADY
Defendant:
GREGORY DOZIER, CEDRIC TAYLOR, MICHAEL PITTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CURRY v. SELLARS et al
as 5:2017cv00424
Plaintiff:
JARMOND CURRY
Defendant:
ERIC SELLARS, MELINDA DAVIS, SHEPARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
