Cases 1 - 10 of 224
Curry v. Pickens County Sheriff Office et al
as 2:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
John P. Curry
Defendant:
Pickens County Sheriff Office, Deputy K. England and Deputy A. Sigman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hutchinson et al v. The United States et al
as 1:2023cv03715
Plaintiff:
George Baldwin Hutchinson, Jr. and G. Baldwin: House of Hutchinson:man
Defendant:
The United States, People in Key Roles of Offices of Director and Chief Counsel of Defense Finance and Accounting Service, Audrey Y. Davis and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03643
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Curry v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv02592
Plaintiff:
Nikki Curry
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Women's Health, LLC, Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Curry v. Maldano et al
as 1:2023cv02163
Defendant:
Mike Maldano, Piece of Cake, Philip Klink and others
Plaintiff:
Debra D. Curry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Subpoena Issued to Caldwell Cassady & Curry
as 1:2023mi00030
Plaintiff:
Subpoena Issued to Caldwell Casssady & Curry and Subpoena Issued to Caldwell Cassady & Curry
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv00030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
POPE v. SPRAYBERRY et al
as 4:2022cv00203
Plaintiff:
FRANKIE WAYNE POPE
Defendant:
Warden KEVIN SPRAYBERRY, WILLIAM LESLIE KIRBY, III, KIRBY AND KIRBY LAW FIRM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KING v. HERRING et al
as 5:2022cv00176
Plaintiff:
EDDIE JAMES KING
Defendant:
WADE W HERRING, III and ALISON L CURRIE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
