Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1150
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv10401
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv10316
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01439
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv10419
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
In Re: Da Graca, et al
as 20-2117
Interested Party:
OSVALDO MOTA, ANDREA JOY JAMES, LUCAS VALENTIM and others
Petitioner:
JOAO AMADO, FRED KAYITARE, CONROY LEWIS and others
Respondent:
THOMAS M. HODGSON, in his official capacity as Bristol County Sheriff, STEVEN J. SOUZA, Superintendent Bristol County House of Corrections in his Official Capacity, CHAD F. WOLF, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security and others
Okoli v. Barr
as 20-1770
Petitioner:
CYRIL NNADOZIE OKOLI
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Cyril Okoli v. USCIS
as 20-72044
Petitioner:
CYRIL NNADOZIE OKOLI
Not Classified By Court:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General and In re: CYRIL NNADOZIE OKOLI
Respondent:
UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES
In Re: Cyril Nnadozie Okoli
as 20-1995
Petitioner:
Cyril Nnadozie Okoli
Respondent:
William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Cyril Okoli v. William Barr
as 20-71697
Petitioner:
CYRIL NNADOZIE OKOLI
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
