Cases 1 - 10 of 93
(PC) Davis v. Beckham et al
as 2:2024cv00648
Plaintiff:
Chateton D. Davis
Defendant:
I. Beckham, Hobbs and C. Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lolita D. Davis v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv10154
Plaintiff:
Lolita D Davis
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Davis v. Maher et al
as 3:2023cv04147
Plaintiff:
Astarte Davis
Defendant:
Joan Maher, Loyal D. Davis, Betty Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Terrence D. Davis v. General Atomics et al
as 8:2023cv00132
Plaintiff:
Terence D. Davis
Defendant:
General Atomics, N/L Blue, Danzig and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv09120
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
(PC) Onley v. Davis et al
as 2:2022cv01795
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Franklin Onley
Defendant:
D. Davis, A. Dohoda, L. Rocha and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Onley v. Davis et al
as 4:2022cv05276
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Franklin Onley
Defendant:
D. Davis, A. Dohoda, L. Rocha and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00278
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Wright et al v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
as 4:2021cv06082
Plaintiff:
Andrea N. Wright, Barbara Fields, Bernard Coates and others
Defendant:
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
(PS) Davis v. CA Department of Justice
as 2:2021cv01272
Plaintiff:
Williene D. Davis
Defendant:
CA Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
