Cases 1 - 10 of 72
Downey v. Harding
as 4:2024cv00158
Petitioner:
Johnie D Downey
Respondent:
Randy Harding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Howard v. Parks, et al.
as 1:2024cv00285
Plaintiff:
Karlis Ruben Augustus Howard
Defendant:
Aylana Olivia Parks, J. Membreno, H. Salazar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Javier Montemayor v. Kankakee County, Illinois, et al
as 22-2474
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAVIER MONTEMAYOR
Defendant / Appellee:
KANKAKEE COUNTY, ILLINOIS, MICHAEL D. DOWNEY, STEPHEN BLACK and others
Thompson v Downey, et al
as 2:2021cv02276
Plaintiff:
Tracie Thompson
Defendant:
Michael D Downey and Unknown Kankakee County Deputy Sheriffs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v Downey, et al
as 1:2021cv05028
Plaintiff:
Tracie Thompson
Counter Defendant:
SHERIFF Michael D Downey
Defendant:
Michael D Downey and Unknown Kankakee County Deputy Sheriffs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doss v. Kolitwenzew et al
as 2:2021cv02214
Plaintiff:
Gregory Doss, Jr
Defendant:
Chad Kolitwenzew, Michael D Downey and Jerome Combs Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Finn v. Jerome Combs Detention Center et al
as 2:2021cv02204
Plaintiff:
Shane Finn
Defendant:
Jerome Combs Detention Center, Michael D Downey, Chad Kolitwenzew and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Downey v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 5:2020cv01040
Plaintiff:
Amee D Downey
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00626
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Phillip Horrell v. David Gomez
as 20-1417
Respondent / Appellee:
MICHAEL D. DOWNEY, Kankakee County Sheriff and DAVID GOMEZ
Petitioner / Appellant:
PHILLIP L. HORRELL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
