Cases 1 - 10 of 26
HERSH v. MCFADDEN et al
as 2:2020cv03197
Respondent:
GEORGE ROBERTS, SCOTT REYNOLDS and D EDWARD MCFADDEN
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER M. HERSH, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02061
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
FORD v. MCFADDEN et al
as 2:2018cv04761
Defendant:
LPN MARKELLE POWELL, PRIME CARE MEDICAL, INC., WARDEN D. EDWARD MCFADDEN and others
Plaintiff:
BRENTON A. FORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS v. MCFADDEN et al
as 2:2018cv01350
Plaintiff:
MARKUS JAMES THOMAS
Defendant:
D. EDWARD MCFADDEN, ROY HAMILTON, GEORGE YOUNG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARK v. THE COUNTY OF CHESTER et al
as 2:2018cv00718
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER LAYNE PARK
Defendant:
THE COUNTY OF CHESTER and D. EDWARD MCFADDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CREDICO v. MCFADDEN et al
as 2:2017cv03672
Petitioner:
JUSTIN CREDICO
Respondent:
D. EDWARD MCFADDEN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF CHESTER COUNTY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BROWN et al v. COUNTY OF CHESTER et al
as 2:2017cv03312
Receiver:
GARTOR K. BROWN
Plaintiff:
KEVIN K. CRAWFORD, JR., BOBBY CARPENTER, JAMAIL DASIM ROBERTSON and others
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CHESTER, TERENCE FARRELL, KATH COZZONE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RICHARDSON v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2017cv01999
Plaintiff:
COREY RICHARDSON
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL , JOSEPH KORSZNIAK , CYTHIA LINK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RICHARDSON v. MCFADDEN
as 2:2017cv00253
Petitioner:
DAVID D. RICHARDSON
Respondent:
D. EDWARD MCFADDEN and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF CHESTER COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BROWN v. CHESTER COUNTY PRISON et al
as 2:2016cv03097
Plaintiff:
DONALD P. BROWN, SR.
Defendant:
TERENCE FARRELL, D. EDWARD MCFADDEN, MORGAN TAYLOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
