Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Sockeye Licensing TX LLC v. D & H Distributing Company
as 1:2022cv01480
Plaintiff:
Sockeye Licensing TX LLC
Defendant:
D & H Distributing Company
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
D.H. v. WARD
as 5:2022cv01028
Plaintiff:
D. H.
Defendant:
KEVIN P. WARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jones v. D & H Distributing Company
as 1:2019cv01313
Plaintiff:
Dessirae Jones
Defendant:
D & H Distributing Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
D.H. v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH et al
as 2:2018cv01258
Plaintiff:
In re D. H.
Defendant:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH and PORT AUTHORITY TRANSIT OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jem Accessories, Inc. v. D&H Distributing, Co.
as 1:2017cv02411
Plaintiff:
Jem Accessories, Inc.
Defendant:
D&H Distributing, Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Maietta et al v. Malski et al
as 3:2017cv01305
Plaintiff:
Richard A. Maietta and Claire Maietta
Defendant:
Michele L. Malski , CP Rail Systems Corp. , Canadian Pacific Railway and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thompson v. D&H Distributing Company
as 1:2013cv02482
Plaintiff:
Teresa A. Thompson
Defendant:
D&H Distributing Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
HIGHTOWER v. D&H JUBILEE, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv04862
Plaintiff:
MARGARET HIGHTOWER
Defendant:
D&H JUBILEE, INC., FOODNET/PENNSYLVANIA, L.L.C., NAVAL SUPPORT ACTIVITY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
METTS et al v. FLM DEVELOPMENT CO. INC. et al
as 5:2010cv07233
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J. METTS and WENDY D. METTS
Defendant:
FLM DEVELOPMENT CO. INC., JAY-SCOT BUILDERS and FRANK J. PROVANZO
3Rd Party Defendant:
D. H. FUNK AND SONS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
D&H Distributing Company v. Archbrook Laguna, LLC
as 1:2010cv01382
Plaintiff:
D&H Distributing Company
Defendant:
Archbrook Laguna, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
