Cases 1 - 10 of 16
RAMBERT v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2020cv01760
Defendant:
D. L. YINGLING, ERIC D. RAY, JOHN E. WETZEL and others
Plaintiff:
ERIC X. RAMBERT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
DAVIS v. PEARSON, et al
as 3:2017cv00174
Plaintiff:
PATRICK DAVIS
Defendant:
JANET PEARSON, D. L. NAJI, MICHELLE MCMULLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Pearson et al
as 4:2017cv01722
Plaintiff:
Patrick Davis
Defendant:
Janet Pearson, D. L. Naji, Michelle McMullen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O.K. Sales, Inc. v. Celtic Cabinetry & Mill Work et al
as 3:2017cv01372
Plaintiff:
O.K. Sales, Inc.
Defendant:
Celtic Cabinetry & Mill Work, D&L Holding Group, Inc. and David Gleason
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Massaquoi v. McConaughey et al
as 3:2017cv00938
Plaintiff:
Manna Massaquoi
Defendant:
J. McConaughey, T. Deljanovan, S. A. Seese and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv01620
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
HILL v. UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS et al
as 1:2017cv00508
Plaintiff:
Tamara E. Hill
Defendant:
Weston Solutions, Inc. , D. L. George And Sons Construction Company , D.L. George And Sons Manufacturing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
HILL v. UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS et al
as 2:2017cv00941
Plaintiff:
TAMARA E. HILL
Defendant:
WESTON SOLUTIONS, INC., D. L. GEORGE AND SONS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY , D.L. GEORGE AND SONS MANUFACTURING, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2679
ODOM v. YOUNGE
as 2:2016cv03861
Petitioner:
ROBERT ODOM
Respondent:
D L YOUNGE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Begnoche v. DeRose et al
as 3:2012cv01057
Plaintiff:
Paul J Begnoche, Sr.
Defendant:
D. L. DeRose , J.T. Haste , Michael H.W. Pries and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
