Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Montgomery v. Waterloo Police Department et al
as 6:2023cv02009
Plaintiff:
Tavares Montgomery and Tavares D Williams
Defendant:
Waterloo Police Department, Marcus Harrington, Admir Babic and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. State of Iowa
as 4:2020cv00350
Respondent:
State of Iowa
Petitioner:
Antonio D. Williams, Sr.
Interested Party:
Kevin Cmelik
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. Ankeny Police Officers
as 4:2020cv00283
Defendant:
Polk County, Polk County Courthouse, Police Officer and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio D Williams, Sr. and Antonio D. Williams, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. State of Iowa
as 4:2019cv00142
Plaintiff:
Antonio D Williams, Sr.
Defendant:
State of Iowa
Interested Party:
William A Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Wittrock et al SEE DISMISSED DEFENDANTS PER [2] IRO
as 5:2015cv04043
Plaintiff:
Harold D Williams
Defendant:
Brad Wittrock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Benson et al
as 5:2015cv04035
Plaintiff:
Harold D Williams
Defendant:
Mary Benson and Stephen Veit, MD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shelton v. State of Iowa
as 4:2015cv00121
Petitioner:
Kimberley Shelton
Respondent:
State of Iowa
Movant:
Antonio D Williams, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. Palmer et al DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE - THE LEAD CASE TO DOCKET IN IS C12-4086DEO
as 5:2013cv04052
Plaintiff:
Harold D Williams
Defendant:
Charles Palmer, Matthew Royster, Bob Stout and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. State of Iowa
as 4:2013cv00151
Plaintiff:
Antonio D Williams, Sr.
Defendant:
Yolanda N Winters and Polk County Courthouse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Williams v. Palmer et al
as 5:2012cv04045
Plaintiff:
Harold D Williams
Defendant:
Charles Palmer, Jason Smith, Mike Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
