Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Peter Allan, Sr., et al v. Minnesota DHS, et al
as 24-1329
Plaintiff:
Peter Allan, Sr., Russell Hatton, Michael D. Benson and others
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Human Services, Jodi Harpstead, in her official capacity as Commissioner of Department of Human Services, Marshall Smith, in his official capacity as Chief Executive Director of Direct Care and Treatment for the Minnesota Sex Offender Program and others
Benson v. May et al
as 1:2022cv01188
Plaintiff:
Joshua D. Benson
Defendant:
Warden Robert May and Kathleen Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marquette Benson v. Grady Perry
as 22-5061
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARQUETTE D. BENSON, aka Marquette Mukes
Respondent / Appellee:
GRADY PERRY, Warden
Benson v. May et al
as 1:2021cv01369
Plaintiff:
Joshua D. Benson and Adkins
Defendant:
Robert May, Phillip Parker, Robert Heishman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benson v. May et al
as 1:2020cv01602
Respondent:
Warden Robert May and Kathleen Jennings
Petitioner:
Joshua D. Benson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Austin v. Washington County et al
as 2:2019cv01529
Plaintiff:
Richard L Austin, Jr
Defendant:
Mark D Benson, Katherine Romanovich, Braedy P Helmbrecht and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benson v. Kansas, State of et al
as 5:2018cv03237
Defendant:
(fnu) (lnu) and Kansas, State of
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Benson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benson v. Topeka Police Department, City of et al
as 5:2018cv03178
Defendant:
(fnu) (lnu) and Topeka Police Department, City of
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Benson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jeffrey Benson v. Nancy Bowens, et al
as 18-1367
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY D. BENSON
Defendant - Appellee:
NANCY BOWENS, DANIELLE FOSTER, THERESA MURPHY and others
Jeffrey Benson v. Nancy Bowens, et al
as 17-2804
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY D. BENSON
Defendant - Appellee:
NANCY BOWENS, DANIELLE FOSTER, THERESA MURPHY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
